The submittal is rejected as it does not provide the required information as given below; (1) Dated Schedule of planned Constructability reviews. (2) Stages at which constructability reviews shall take place are not sufficient, e.g. Post development, pre-construction, mid-constriction and post construction, pre-procurement, post procurement etc. shall be included. (3) Constructability reviews are a cross-check of construction documents for accuracy, completeness, and systems coordination issues and to find inconsistencies between plans and specifications. These reviews shall also highlight limitations of access for work to be conducted. (4) Compatibility of materials, List of foreseen complexities envisaged during construction, Necessary Coordination of selective trades, Sequencing and project scheduling etc shall be checked (5) Team members/ experts for constructability reviews shall be mentioned (6) How and when the construction teams be reviewed for maximum efficiency and monitored with respect to the schedule requirements. (7) There is no need to rewrite the project specifications and a one small paragraph shall be sufficient to describe the nature of the project. (8) Plans provided with submittal are irrelevant as no constructability issues if any are explained (9) How and when traffic shall be managed during construction (10) How and when security issues be reviewed and handled during construction (11) What safety related problems are envisaged and how and when shall they be reviewed/ handled. (12) How existing under ground utilities shall be taken care of and what might become an obstacle and how and when will it be resolved. (13) How is the project phased and how will the manpower and equipment be allocated/ divided/ managed (14) older reviews shall be used as an appendix and not a part of the original document. (15) The document is poorly organized with appendices as well as attachments and pictures with no connection with the paras in the document or captions.