In response to your letter M&U-13-0024 dated October 10, 2013, we have the following comments;//
a. The Perimeter security system is designed according to HCIS SEC-02, clause 4.3 for Category 1 fensing system, which requires clearly identifieable layers as follows;//i) External Interface layer 15m wide, //ii) Anti-vehicle layer 15m wide which includes the ditch,//iii) Anti-personnel layer exists in the shape of an existing Kaust fense,//iv) Intrusion sensors layer 7.5m wide,// v) Lighting layer 3m wide, //vi) Internal interface layer 9.6m wide. Maintaining the functionality of these latyers as seperate entities "sharing a common border" or "contiguous" is crucial to design of the security system in this category with a layered approach and as described in the very first paragraph of the afore-mentioned clause and also in clause no 4.2.2 of SEC-02.
b. Keeping in view the available space and existing facilities/ utilties, maximum caution has been exercised to maintain the integrity of the layers as per requirements of HCIS. Any conflicts or deviations as mentioned in SEC-02, para 1.3 shall be resolved by HCIS and SAPMT is of the view that KAUST preferences can be incorporated if a waiver is acquired from HCIS. 