SAMPT has reviewed the subject letter dated March 02, 2015 and has rejected with the following comments:

1.	The IC proposal for the project shows highly experienced people for these key positions, some of them containing 20 years and more with advanced degrees, whereas the personnel mentioned in IC reply ANW/15/1086 do not have comparable magnitude of experience, thus IC justification is rejected.
2.	IC proposals are evaluated based on the listed key personnel nominated for the project by IC and not providing same or comparable people is a breach of contract. IC shall provide a comparative chart of qualifications and experiences between the personnel pledged in the bid and the ones available on site for key positions mentioned in Para 5.4.4 of SCH-B.


IC shall ensure that no scope change or cost/schedule implication arises from this letter.
