The TQ is rejected because IC has mentioned the justification for changes to the tie-in for irrigation wrongly. IC has delayed works and procurements, does not have materials and related manpower on site and the proposed changes in design might help IC in expediting the handover of KAM road. Any negative or positive changes made to the IFB shall be considered as variations but any voluntary additions or additional steps taken by IC to meet the targets can not be considered for compensation.