Based on technical review meeting for 90%DD for KAUST perimeter security systems  , the following items are not a part of approved project proposal and need a  project change request (PCR) to be initiated by KAUST:
1) Guard house for Wadi Al Wesami shall be equipped with Thermal camera monitoring underneath the bridge and IDAS workstation and data communication.
2) CCTV coverage for all Visitor office cameras.
3) Physical security measures like CR bollards at the bed of  Wadi Al Wesami & Wadi Khulais.
4) CCTV coverage for KAM access road.
5) Warning signage to be place on the tire shredder.
6) Access road from inside KAUST to the Island in the south
7) Integration Gate 2 & Gate 3 with MOI.
8) CCTV coverage for all guard houses focusing on the crash barrier control panels.
9) CCTV coverage for electrical room and exit door.
10) Vessel barrier detection system is not shown in the proposed LCD screens view.
11) LPRS system will be integrated with ministry of interior in national information center.
12) install Panic button in all gates and UVIS buildings  to cause alarm in JFCC to respond.
13) Relocation of the existing fiber optical cables (STC, Mobily &ITC)
14) DDC panel to be connected to the TER- IT network switch through Bac net/IP for future connection to central control room.
15) Main Electrical distribution /incomer panel energy meters to be interfaced with DDC  for central power monitoring.
16) PLC  for the booster pump. 
17) Drop arm and crash barrier at Marine gate.
18)  Provide automotive sliding gate at Gate 1 Alpha.
19) Wall from the turnstile building to the Patrol road access in the backside of the gate
20) Swing gate for the ditch shall be equipped the anti-tamper
21)  Emergency doors shall be equipped with buzzer.
22) Parking lot and inspection area shall be covered with IPCCTV System.
23) Data outlet provision for Room 105 and outside.

It is however, suggestion that the following item be removed from the approved scope for the given reasons:
1) Removal of LPRS (License Plate recognition system) at gates 2 and 3, since it only captures the number but is not capable of triggering alerts
2) Removal of UVIS since it’s manually operated and does not provide a comparison between a clean and a tampered vehicle.



Furthermore the KASUT suggestion to change the security system arrangement is considered not according to HCIS requirements. A letter has already been sent date ….

