IC is urged to understand that contractually SAPMT has the right to ask IC to revise the Project Execution Plan as required throughout the execution of work. The wearing course for KAM road is already behind the approved schedule by a month. There are many other activities on KAM road or other parallel activities or procurements which are behind schedule, conveyed to IC regularly by SAPMT; and contractually SAPMT has the right to request the contractor to expedite activities and add more resources to avoid any delays.

The importance of KAM road has been stated to IC all along the project and as early as the detailed design phase, and that’s why IC submitted and SAPMT approved a baseline schedule with KAM road to be completed in March 2014.
 
IC did not prepare and submit a written delay analysis report for slipping activities which is a contractual requirement according to 5.6.3.4 SCH-B. IC did not outline the reasons for the delay, quantify the time delay, identify the impact upon other activities, propose alternative plans to recover from the delay and forecast the overall impact on completion of the WORK. In such circumstances, it is SAPMT’s obligation to advise IC to provide more resources to meet the requirements and if IC delays other parallel activities because of meeting targets for one activity, IC shall be held responsible not SAPMT.

In light of the above IC request for consideration can not be entertained.
